Prices from $289.00 Original price was: $289.00.$168.99Current price is: $168.99.
Title | Default Title |
---|
Product availability and prices may vary in-store.
Australia wide on all orders
Largest range of equipment from all the big brands.
Multiple payment options to suit your needs and high security.
We offer safe shopping guarantee
Like wearing nothing at all. Ref 1, 2, 3
Patients can sleep how they want with the freedom and comfort of DreamWear. Ref 1, 2, 3
Over the last five years, you have come to know the benefits of the Philips Respironics DreamWear system of masks. It allows patients to easily swap cushions so that they can find a fit that’s right for them. Our innovative design directs airflow through the frame so patients can wear glasses, watch TV and sleep comfortably. And, the tubing connection located at the top of the head allows patients to sleep in any position – stomach, side or back.
Users told us that DreamWear came closest to making them feel like they have nothing on their face during therapy and that they experienced more freedom of movement than with their prescribed mask. Ref 1, 2, 3
References: 1. Switching from a nasal cushion to a full face cushion requires different headgear and instructions. Consumers must consult their provider before making adjustments. 2. Analysis after 30 day of use during Jul/Aug 2020. Pillows preference trial with (n=127). Prescribed masks include ResMed AirFit P10, P30i, Swift Fx, F&P Brevida, Philips DreamWear Gel Pillows, Nuance / Pro. 3. Data analysis after 90 days of use. 2019 Philips sponsored patient preference trial (n=310). Patients scanned using the Mask Selector (n=153) vs traditional fitting methods (n=157) 4. Philips sponsored patient preference trial. (n=310, n=253 completed questionnaire). Patient scanned using the Mask Selector (n=118) vs traditional fitting methods (n=135) 5. Data analysis after 90 days of use. Philips sponsored patient preference trial. (n=310, n=253 completed questionnaire). Patient scanned using the Mask Selector (n=118) vs traditional fitting methods (n=135)
Follow us at